"US Consulate Merges with Embassy in
Jerusalem" by Ma'an News Agency
U.S Consulate of Israel |
Jerusalem is in hopes to “form a
single diplomatic mission”. The reason behind this controversy stems further
back to the even more controversial moving of the US embassy of Israel to Jerusalem
recognizing it as Israel’s Capital. This sparked protest among the Palestinian
people feeling that the US government isn’t recognizing eastern Jerusalem as
the capital of their future independent state. So by now merging the U.S consulate of Israel, which had been open to all Israeli citizens but had mostly been serving Palestinians living in Jerusalem as the main channel allowing local communities/citizens to communicate with the government on affairs between US diplomacy and Palestinian leadership. Palestinians feel that the consulate will stop acting as an independent diplomatic mission as it will be working under the same roof as the U.S ambassador David Friedmen. The Palestinians feel a sense of bias from the United States as they have moved both the U.S embassy and Consulate to Jerusalem. The Palestinian government has cut ties with the trump administration as it calls it unfit to mediate between Israel and Palestine. U.S Deputy State Department spokesperson, Robert Palladino stated that the merge would not interfere with any previous diplomatic or consular functions performed by the U.S embassy Jerusalem. Also mentioning that there will be a “Palestinian Affairs Unit” to serve Palestinians living in Jerusalem operating through the previous consulate location on Aragon road. Hanan Ashrawi, Palestinian Liberation
Organization (PLO) Executive Committee Member, said
in a statement sharing
here thoughts on the merging of the U.S Consulate in Jerusalem with the U.S
Embassy to Israel is “not an administrative decision. It is an act of political
assault on Palestinian rights and identity and a negation of the Consulate's
historic status and function, dating back nearly two hundred years.”
The
author does do a good job at quoting what political officials had to say on the
matter such as US state department spokesman, Robert Palladino, although there
was not a time or place it was said. On the other hand while quoting what Hanan
Ashrawi, Palestinian Leadership organization (PLO) committee member had to say,
there was a link to another article dedicated to her words. And although the
author doesn’t need to give a background about the U.S ambassador of Israel,
David Friedman, I do feel it is worth noting that he was a lawyer at a law firm
where he met and represented Donald Trump, then served as an advisor for trump
during his successful political campaign. Which shows he was appointed as
ambassador because he was loyal to Mr. Trump. The author explains that other
countries such as Guatemala and Australia but doesn’t quite give too much
evidence on that more hearsay than anything.
Unfortunately there is no author taking credit for this piece so I could not research his or her political background or previous tone to similar events. Although I sense no real political side was chosen on this matter the writer does tend to portray more of a loss on the Palestinian side than a win for Israel. Focusing more on what the Palestinian Leaders Organization (PLO) had to say on the merge.
Unfortunately there is no author taking credit for this piece so I could not research his or her political background or previous tone to similar events. Although I sense no real political side was chosen on this matter the writer does tend to portray more of a loss on the Palestinian side than a win for Israel. Focusing more on what the Palestinian Leaders Organization (PLO) had to say on the merge.
Comments
Post a Comment